|
发表于 22-1-2015 16:33:18|来自:新加坡
|
显示全部楼层
一般不会了,我只是自己先研究好.要是拿一大笔回去带孩子也不错:)
MOM 网站Maternity Leave:
If employer terminates the employment of a pregnant employee without sufficient cause or retrenched her during any point of her pregnancy (as certified by a registered medical practitioner prior to receiving the notice of termination/dismissal or retrenchment), the employer is required to pay the employee maternity benefits she would have otherwise been eligible for. - See more at: http://www.mom.gov.sg/employment-practices/leave-and-holidays/Pages/maternity-leave.aspx#sthash.DcUpPnM0.dpuf
上面很明确产假待遇必须要给的!
Employment Act:
Right to benefit unaffected by notice of dismissal given without sufficient cause
84.—(1) Without prejudice to sections 81 and 84A, no notice of dismissal given without sufficient cause by an employer to a female employee which —(b)if given on or after 1st May 2013, is given at any time of her pregnancy (as certified by a medical practitioner before the notice of dismissal is given), where the female employee has served the employer for a period of 3 months or more immediately preceding the day the notice is given; or
shall have the effect of depriving her of any payment to which, but for that notice, she would have been entitled or would, on or before the date of her confinement, have become entitled to under this Part.
84A.—(1) Without prejudice to sections 81 and 84, no notice of dismissal given to a female employee by her employer on the ground of redundancy or by reason of any reorganisation of her employer’s profession, business, trade or work —(b)if given on or after 1st May 2013, is given at any time of her pregnancy (as certified by a medical practitioner before the notice of dismissal is given), where the female employee has served the employer for a period of 3 months or more immediately preceding the day the notice is given; or
shall have the effect of depriving her of any payment to which, but for that notice, she would have been entitled or would, on or before the date of her confinement, have become entitled to under this Part.
这两条比较绕。是说生产前的福利也不受任何影响吗?难道需要支付从裁员到生产的福利?
|
|