新加坡狮城论坛

返回列表 发帖 付费广告
楼主: 踩沙滩的人

[狮城水库] 新加坡妖娆哥玩火被开除了!

[复制链接]
发表于 2-8-2011 19:16:53|来自:新加坡 | 显示全部楼层
transformers 发表于 2-8-2011 19:02
忽视所有人,只挺李光耀。

我不是为这件事,挺李光耀,这种小事,李光耀是不会涉入的。

这个学生被开除的罪魁祸首是李光耀党派的对手,Alex Tan.

我解释下,不不解释的话,等下有人攻击我了。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2-8-2011 19:22:28|来自:新加坡 | 显示全部楼层
小狮租房
Notsing 发表于 2-8-2011 19:16
跟他玩玩,挺过颍的!

我不是新加坡人,也觉得争吵没什么好玩的。不过李光耀对新加坡的贡献实在很大,而且也多次为亚洲人,争了气。

如此政治家,值得赞赏。

我也不敢想象,他百年之后,新加坡知否还可保持盛况,如果下一代领导人,没有他的气度和铁腕的话。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2-8-2011 19:25:27|来自:新加坡 | 显示全部楼层

粗话满天飞。。。。斑竹还不删id。。。。。。快删了吧。。。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2-8-2011 19:28:56|来自:新加坡 | 显示全部楼层
Notsing  学学李刚更好,现代真正的中国领导者 :P



嘲讽他人,并不是高等的表现。有时间嘲讽他人,不如思考下,新加坡今日的繁荣是建立什么之上,以及自己与你们开国之父之间的涵养以及品格上的差距。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2-8-2011 19:30:35|来自:新加坡 | 显示全部楼层
Notsing 发表于 2-8-2011 19:28
我读过他两本书,写的不错。他非常羡慕邓小平,说他是近代中国其中最有眼光与极能力的领导者。 ...

谢谢夸奖,互相学习。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2-8-2011 19:36:54|来自:新加坡 | 显示全部楼层
Notsing 发表于 2-8-2011 19:16
跟他玩玩,挺过颍的!

实话实说,李光耀是有用相当胸襟的人,虽然惟利是图。不过,作为资源稀缺的城市国家的领导人,想在国际上生存,不惟利是图的话,是无法生存的,换作再崇高的人,也会以自己国家的利益为根本。不过,新加坡新一代的辅政人,很多人的胸襟不够宽广。如果这样的话,新加坡总有一天失去他的核心竞争力。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2-8-2011 19:46:43|来自:新加坡 | 显示全部楼层
Arsin 发表于 2-8-2011 17:51
Grammaticaland syntax errors? I believe you are talking about yourself.
It’sOK, you are excused.  ...

Grammaticaland syntax errors? I believe you are talking about yourself.
It’sOK, you are excused. I know you speak pure Singlish rather than English.
I'm wondering what on earth do you have allowing u to get stuck-up? Show us yr superiority before fanning out yrbullshit !
Asfar as I can see, yr arrogant and imperious imlies nothing but yr ignorantness.
Takea look at yrself, don't u know you look just like a blind dingo, shortsighted, underbred and aggressive,barking towards all nonnative Chinese.
Yes, that's all I can see.


For goodness sake, I really had problems trying to comprehend your message. If you have to reprimand someone, use simple and direct words to form your sentences. I made the following interpretation for you. I certainly hope I did not misunderstand you. And I hope you will not mind that I actually agree to notsing. You have a lot of catching up to do in terms of your English language.

Grammatical Errors? I believe you are talking about yourself.
It's fine, I can excuse your insolance for I know you speak pure Singlish rather than proper English.
I'm wondering what caused your arrogance? You display your appalling sense of superiority complex before spilling out your bullshit!
As far as I can see, your arrogance and impertinence is nothing but a manifestation of your ignorance.
Do you know that you look just like a blind animal, short sighted, ill-bred and overly hostile continuously barking towards all Chinese.
Well, yes! That's what I see in you.


点评

Thanks for yr correction. It does read better. A for yr privious Q: in someone's eyes, every chinese against him is socalled chauvinist..  详情 回复 发表于 2-8-2011 21:44
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2-8-2011 19:47:31|来自:新加坡 | 显示全部楼层
Notsing 发表于 2-8-2011 19:37
我不是新加坡来的。他们的经济基础是以制造业,旅游,服务业和金融行业酿成的。这加上以美国建立良好外交 ...

我本人最为赞赏的是新加坡的金融业。

至于美国的话,美国的外交政策,向来是区域性政治抗衡政策。寻找那些自身比较薄弱或者比较可能面临区域性政治风险的国家作为棋子,帮助他到达他的目的而已。

李光耀其实一直认识到这个问题,无非是相互利用而已。

全球政治游戏,美国玩得最好。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2-8-2011 19:56:23|来自:新加坡 | 显示全部楼层
Notsing 发表于 2-8-2011 19:41
我可不是来自新国,可你所说的话完全正确,反映有学问读书人的想法。 ...

谢谢评价,惭愧惭愧。

我始终认为,新加坡如果要在几十年或者几百年后,依旧拥有蓬勃生机,大马是他的一座靠山。单看现在的盛况是没有用的,依靠其自身发展,总会有一个尽头。好比,香港、澳门与中国大陆的一国两制,新加坡或许将来某一天会返回联邦,与马来西亚成为一国两制。至于政党制度,这个比较复杂,也很难说。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2-8-2011 19:58:45|来自:新加坡 | 显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 SG_lion 于 2-8-2011 20:00 编辑
transformers 发表于 2-8-2011 19:36
实话实说,李光耀是有用相当胸襟的人,虽然惟利是图。不过,作为资源稀缺的城市国家的领导人,想在国际上 ...


Although Lee Kuan Yew made many contributions to the building up of the Singapore, he was not without controversy. For the sake of wrestling power into his hands, he was responsible for the incarceration of many political rivals. It is beyond my liberty to decide if what he did was right or not. Also, he made many remarks of late that does not resonate well with the local community.

No doubt his contributions are colossal, but we have to take note that all will not be possible if he did not have the help of many ministers who painstakingly gave all they had to build up Singapore. People like Dr Goh Keng Swee, Mr Rajaratnam, Mr Toh Chin Chye, Mr EW Barker etc.

Success would not have been possible without these men.

How about watching the videos from this thread to gain more insight to the history of Singapore? Although the programs are not as elaborate as it should've been, I think it serves to draw a very good framework of how Singapore came by after all these years.
http://bbs.sgchinese.net/thread-4610660-1-1.html

Be discerning, do not be held by your nose with whatever you read on one side. Have a mind of your own and form your own opinion while respecting those who subscribe to a different view.
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表回复

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册会员 新浪微博登陆

本版积分规则

联系客服 关注微信 下载APP 小程序 返回顶部 返回列表